This prompt is incessant and will continue to appear until Allow is clicked (no matter how many times you click 'Don't Allow'). On macOS 11+ clients the user is prompted to allow "proxy configurations". So far this process is working OK for macOS 10.15 Catalina clients, with no prompts to the user at login. The install takes place in the background while no user is logged in. We use a Smart Computer Group to identify those Macs where the config profile has been installed for scoping the client install Policy (which runs at Recurring Check-in, Once per computer). currently, and using a combined Config Profile containing both Approved Kernel Extensions and System Extensions (to cover macOS 10.15+). I've been working on deployment of the Netskope Client to macOS 11+ (Big Sur, Monterey, etc) recently. The more members we have, the more that's shared and the stronger/better we all get together!!! Lastly, please do join the Netskope Community: Be sure to follow best practices with VPN clients and interop with Netskope, which can be found on the support portal as well.just query your VPN client, and I can almost guarantee you'll find a config doc for it! Most times when issues occur, it's not just one 's when two components are both using the network profiles to spin up tunnels (Anyconnect AND Netskope, for instance).and most of that has been addressed as well. It's no secret: the new architecture of system/network profiles vs kexts has presented some challenges for ALL VENDORS as we adopt to the new way/permissions required to operate successfully, and we've put a lot of time into researching/building/troubleshooting/etc. The second is more around the client operation itself. The first is specifically to JAMF deployment, per the name. From a JAMF/Big Sur perspective, hop on over to our support portal and check out these articles: Obviously, this posting I'm responding to is a bit old the client version is showing 80.x, and we're now on 88.x, so that speaks to the changes/progress version wise. First, I'll state: I'M A NETSKOPE EMPLOYEE Now that that's out of the way, we've been GA for Big Sur for some time now. Hey all!! Just wanted to hop in here and update everyone on a few things that have happened. You guys are paying for support with the Netskope client, may as well use it. Unfortunately all roads here really point to reaching out to Netskope. Or there is something wrong with Netskopes configuration. Either your Macs are not setup in a way Netskope can function (not likely) and Netskope needs to help with that. If you are running the installer manually and still having issues the problem is Netskope not the mac or JAMF. Assuming you have the right URL and Tenant as parameters for the script (that Netskope provides) there is not really anything else on the Mac that would go wrong. If it installed correctly you probably need to let whoever owns Netskope get with the vendor on the configuration. Netskope is a beast and there is tons of server side configuration, and that is where most issues lie in my experience. We are also domain binding using mobile accounts. We have Netskope v84, MacOS Big Sur 11.4 and UPN mode, no real issues less a poorly configured appliance. Please let me know if the user is able to upgrade or not after the creation of the certificate pinned you may want to start your own thread as this one is kinda old.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |